In a surprising turn of events, U.S. President Donald Trump has indicated a temporary halt on imposing additional tariffs on countries purchasing Russian oil, following a high-profile summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. The announcement comes amidst heightened tensions over trade policies and the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, with India facing significant scrutiny for its continued energy trade with Russia.

Trump-Putin Summit: A Step Toward De-escalation?

The summit, held on August 15, 2025, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, was aimed at negotiating a potential ceasefire in the Russia-Ukraine war. While both leaders described the talks as “productive,” no concrete agreement was reached. Trump, speaking to Fox News’ Sean Hannity, expressed optimism about the discussions, stating, “I don’t have to think about [tariffs on Russian oil buyers] right now. I may have to think about it in two or three weeks or something, but we don’t have to think about that right now. I think, you know, the meeting went very well.”

This statement marks a shift from Trump’s earlier aggressive stance, where he imposed a 25% tariff on Indian goods, later doubled to 50%, as a penalty for India’s continued imports of Russian crude oil. The tariffs, set to take effect on August 27, were part of a broader strategy to pressure Moscow by targeting its key oil buyers, including India and China.

Trump’s decision to pause further tariff actions has sparked speculation about whether the Alaska summit yielded behind-the-scenes assurances from Putin. However, the lack of a tangible agreement on Ukraine means that the threat of future tariffs remains, with Trump leaving open the possibility of revisiting the issue in the coming weeks.

Democratic Panel Criticizes Tariff Strategy

The U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee of Democrats, responsible for overseeing foreign policy, sharply criticized Trump’s tariff approach, particularly its focus on India. In a statement posted on X, the panel argued, “Tariffing India won’t stop Putin. If Trump really wanted to address Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine, maybe punish Putin and give Ukraine the military aid it needs. Everything else is smoke and mirrors.”

The Democratic panel’s remarks were in response to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s warning that India could face even higher secondary tariffs if the Trump-Putin talks failed to produce results. Bessent, in an interview with Bloomberg, had suggested that the tariffs could escalate depending on the outcome of the Alaska summit.

The panel’s critique reflects a broader disagreement with Trump’s strategy, which they view as misdirected. Instead of targeting countries like India, which relies on Russian oil to manage domestic fuel inflation and ensure energy security, the Democrats advocate for direct measures against Russia, such as increased military support for Ukraine.

India’s Stance: Prioritizing National Interests

India, one of Russia’s largest oil buyers, has been caught in the crossfire of U.S. trade policies aimed at curbing Moscow’s war funding. Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, India has significantly increased its imports of discounted Russian crude, surpassing traditional suppliers like Iraq and Saudi Arabia. This strategy has saved India billions, helping to stabilize domestic fuel prices and bolster energy exports to Europe.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has staunchly defended India’s energy trade with Russia, emphasizing the importance of national interests. In a recent statement, Modi declared, “The interest of farmers is our top priority. India will never compromise with the interests of its farmers, livestock holders, and fishermen. And I know that I will have to pay a huge price for this personally, but I am ready. India is ready, for the sake of the country’s farmers, fishermen, and livestock holders.”

India’s foreign ministry has condemned the U.S. tariffs as “unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable,” arguing that its oil imports are driven by market factors and the need to ensure energy security for its 1.4 billion citizens. The ministry has vowed to take all necessary actions to protect national interests.

Economic Implications for India

The 50% tariff, if implemented, is expected to severely impact Indian exports to the U.S., valued at nearly USD 40 billion annually. Sectors such as textiles, marine products, and leather goods are likely to face significant challenges, with exporters warning of potential layoffs and reduced competitiveness. A study by the State Bank of India estimates that suspending Russian oil imports could increase India’s crude oil import bill by USD 9 billion this financial year and USD 12 billion in the next, as alternatives like Iraq and Saudi Arabia offer oil at higher prices.

Despite Trump’s claim that the tariffs have “essentially took [India] out of buying oil from Russia,” Indian officials have clarified that no such suspension has occurred. India continues to procure Russian oil based on cost-effectiveness, maintaining its strategic autonomy in energy policy.

Geopolitical and Economic Risks

Trump’s tariff strategy carries significant risks, both economically and politically. Analysts warn that secondary tariffs on Russian oil buyers could lead to a spike in global oil prices, with a 10% drop in Russia’s oil exports potentially increasing Brent crude prices by USD 6 per barrel, and a 20% drop by USD 11. Such increases could heighten the risk of a U.S. recession and destabilize global financial markets.

Moreover, the selective targeting of India, while sparing China—Russia’s largest oil buyer—has raised questions about fairness. Trump has so far refrained from imposing similar tariffs on China, possibly due to ongoing trade negotiations aimed at reducing tensions. This disparity has led to speculation that India is being disproportionately singled out.

Global Reactions and Future Outlook

European leaders have also shown reluctance to support steep tariffs on China, as noted by Treasury Secretary Bessent during a G7 meeting. This hesitation underscores the complexity of using trade measures to influence geopolitical outcomes.

Meanwhile, posts on X reflect mixed sentiments in India. Some users argue that India’s trade with the U.S. constitutes a small percentage of its GDP, making it viable to continue Russian oil purchases to manage inflation. Others view the tariffs as part of a broader geopolitical strategy, with one user describing it as a “global earthquake” rather than a mere trade dispute.

As the August 27 deadline for the 50% tariff looms, all eyes are on whether Trump will follow through or if further negotiations with Putin could lead to a rollback of sanctions. Former Ambassador Deepak Bhojwani suggested that Trump might be seeking a way to ease tensions before the deadline, but the outcome remains uncertain.

For now, India remains steadfast in its energy partnership with Russia, with Modi reaffirming close ties with Putin in a recent conversation. As global oil markets and geopolitical dynamics continue to evolve, the U.S.-India relationship faces a critical test, with implications for trade, energy security, and international diplomacy.

Stay tuned to Bharat Tone for the latest updates on this developing story.

About the Author
Bharat Tone Staff is a team of dedicated journalists committed to delivering accurate and timely news on global and national developments.